From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langley v. Venco Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.


Order denying motion to require plaintiff separately to state and number her causes of action and to dismiss complaint as to defendants Naphen Co., Incorporated, and George F. Naphen, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and

[*] Appeal dismissed, 254 N.Y. 15. disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Langley v. Venco Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Langley v. Venco Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN LANGLEY, Respondent, v. THE VENCO CORPORATION and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)