From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langley v. Kiddy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Dec 14, 2023
4:23-CV-05112-ACE (E.D. Wash. Dec. 14, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-CV-05112-ACE

12-14-2023

DONNA LANGLEY, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KIDDY, Defendant.


ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ALEXANDER C. EKSTROM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's cause of action against Defendant James Kiddy. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se; Defendant Kiddy has not appeared.

On November 28, 2023, the Court reviewed the complaint and determined Plaintiff failed to state a short and plain statement of a claim showing she is entitled to relief with respect to Defendant Kiddy. See ECF No. 16. While the Court dismissed the Complaint sua sponte under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 (b)(6), the Court afforded Plaintiff an opportunity to amend her complaint to state a claim as to Defendant Kiddy. Id. Plaintiff was permitted 14 days from the date of the order to submit an amended complaint; however, Plaintiff did not timely file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff's action, in its entirety, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is directed to file this Order, provide a copy to Plaintiff, and CLOSE THE FILE.


Summaries of

Langley v. Kiddy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Dec 14, 2023
4:23-CV-05112-ACE (E.D. Wash. Dec. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Langley v. Kiddy

Case Details

Full title:DONNA LANGLEY, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KIDDY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Date published: Dec 14, 2023

Citations

4:23-CV-05112-ACE (E.D. Wash. Dec. 14, 2023)