From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langford v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Apr 6, 1929
276 P. 242 (Okla. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

No. A-6612.

Opinion Filed April 6, 1929.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Conviction for Misdemeanor Affirmed, in Absence of Briefs. Where an appeal from a conviction for a misdemeanor is prosecuted to this court, and no briefs are filed, and an examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error, and the evidence reasonably sustains the judgment, the case will be affirmed.

Appeal from County Court, Kiowa County; J.S. Carpenter, Judge.

Bud Langford was convicted of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Geo. L. Zink, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin Dabney, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $225 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.

Judgment was entered on January 29, 1927. The appeal was lodged in this court May 17, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence amply sustains the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Langford v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Apr 6, 1929
276 P. 242 (Okla. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

Langford v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUD LANGFORD v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 6, 1929

Citations

276 P. 242 (Okla. Crim. App. 1929)
276 P. 242