From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langer v. Music City Hotel LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
21-cv-04159-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04159-PJH

09-24-2021

CHRIS LANGER, Plaintiff, v. MUSIC CITY HOTEL LP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RE: DKT. NO. 10

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's original complaint. Plaintiff failed to oppose the motion to dismiss or even acknowledge the deadline to do so. Plaintiff instead filed an amended complaint six days late, along with notice of his intent to amend the complaint in lieu of opposing defendant's motion. Dkt. 11 & 12.

The court finds defendant's position meritorious. Therefore, the motion is GRANTED.

The court's dismissal of plaintiff's original complaint would necessarily have been with leave to amend, so plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. 12) is permitted to stand. Defendant must respond to plaintiff's amended complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is warned that any more missed deadlines may result in a dismissal with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Langer v. Music City Hotel LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 24, 2021
21-cv-04159-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Langer v. Music City Hotel LP

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS LANGER, Plaintiff, v. MUSIC CITY HOTEL LP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 24, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04159-PJH (N.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2021)