Lange v. Norton

Full title: THEODORE LANGE, Plaintiff, v. GAIL NORTON, Secretary of the Interior…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 23, 2007

Civ. No. 05-3054-TC (D. Or. Jan. 23, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-3054-TC.

January 23, 2007

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 20, 2006 (doc. 51). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiff has timely filed objections (doc. 52). I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 51) that defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 39) is granted and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.