From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lang v. Paquin

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Nov 30, 2011
Case No. 11-CV-00146 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-CV-00146.

November 30, 2011.


DECISION AND ORDER


On October 5, 2011, I issued an order denying Troy Lang's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and the clerk entered final judgment that same day. On November 23, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration. While petitioner does not indicate which Federal Rule of Civil Procedure he is filing his motion under, it appears to be a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Under Rule 59(e), petitioner's motion is untimely. That rule requires a motion to be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment. Rule 60(b) might provide petitioner with more than 28 days to seek relief from the judgment, but petitioner has not based his motion on any of the grounds listed in that rule. The motion only reiterates the arguments made in petitioner's original brief in support of his petition.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration [Docket #18] is DENIED.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin.


Summaries of

Lang v. Paquin

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Nov 30, 2011
Case No. 11-CV-00146 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Lang v. Paquin

Case Details

Full title:LANG v. PAQUIN

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-CV-00146 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 30, 2011)