From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 21, 2008
290 F. App'x 547 (4th Cir. 2008)

Summary

affirming the district court's order dismissing without prejudice a pro se plaintiff's complaint for failing to provide a current mailing address, because the plaintiff "was obligated to keep the district court informed of any change of address"

Summary of this case from Mehraz v. Am. Airlines

Opinion

No. 08-6673.

Submitted: August 14, 2008.

Decided: August 21, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00109-TSE-JFA).

Marcus Lane, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Marcus Lane, Sr., appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to provide a current mailing address. Because Lane was obligated to keep the district court informed of any change of address, we affirm the court's order. We deny Lane's motions for transcript at government expense and appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lane v. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 21, 2008
290 F. App'x 547 (4th Cir. 2008)

affirming the district court's order dismissing without prejudice a pro se plaintiff's complaint for failing to provide a current mailing address, because the plaintiff "was obligated to keep the district court informed of any change of address"

Summary of this case from Mehraz v. Am. Airlines
Case details for

Lane v. Woody

Case Details

Full title:Marcus LANE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.T. WOODY, Sheriff; Lt. Col…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 21, 2008

Citations

290 F. App'x 547 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Mehraz v. Am. Airlines

It is clear that a pro se plaintiff, like any other party, is required to advise the Court of any change in…