From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Whipple

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 18, 2022
No. 20-13444 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

20-13444

08-18-2022

KEITH LANE, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE WHIPPLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS [61]

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds Judge

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights case. The matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's objections to an order issued by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford requiring Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 61.) Plaintiff avers that he has not been served with a copy of the motion and thus cannot respond. Defendants have filed a response to Plaintiff's objections, providing proof that they served Plaintiff with a copy of their motion at his old address. (ECF No. 62.) Defendants acknowledge that Plaintiff recently filed a notice of address change with the Court and state that they have therefore mailed Plaintiff a second copy of their motion to his new address. In light of this response, Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED as moot.

SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 18, 2022, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Lane v. Whipple

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 18, 2022
No. 20-13444 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Lane v. Whipple

Case Details

Full title:KEITH LANE, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE WHIPPLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

No. 20-13444 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, 2022)