From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
No. C 12-04026 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-04026 WHA

03-13-2013

DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE, individually, and for other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S SUR-REPLY BRIEF

Plaintiffs did not assert that they had good cause to amend the scheduling order in their initial motion seeking leave to amend. Defendant may file a sur-reply brief to respond to plaintiffs' assertions of good cause raised in their reply brief. Defendant's sur-reply brief shall not exceed five pages and must be submitted by NOON ON THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
No. C 12-04026 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Lane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE, individually, and for other persons similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-04026 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)