Opinion
No. C 12-04026 WHA
03-13-2013
DANNY LANE and BEVERLY LANE, individually, and for other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.
ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT'S SUR-REPLY BRIEF
Plaintiffs did not assert that they had good cause to amend the scheduling order in their initial motion seeking leave to amend. Defendant may file a sur-reply brief to respond to plaintiffs' assertions of good cause raised in their reply brief. Defendant's sur-reply brief shall not exceed five pages and must be submitted by NOON ON THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE