From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections Paul Wilson

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 13, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1497-AA (D. Or. Jan. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. No. 05-1497-AA.

January 13, 2006


ORDER


Defendant State of Oregon Department of Corrections (the State) moves to dismiss plaintiff's state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Specifically, the State maintains that it is immune from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment. See Ravgor v. Regents of Univ. of Minn., 534 U.S. 533, 540-542 (2002); College Sav. Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527 U.S. 666, 670 (1999); Pennhurst State School and Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 97-100 (1984).

Plaintiff concedes that the Eleventh Amendment bars her state law claims. Accordingly, the State's Motion to Dismiss in Part (doc. 9) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's second, third and fourth claims for relief are HEREBY DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lane v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections Paul Wilson

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jan 13, 2006
Civ. No. 05-1497-AA (D. Or. Jan. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Lane v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections Paul Wilson

Case Details

Full title:LORA LANE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAUL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 13, 2006

Citations

Civ. No. 05-1497-AA (D. Or. Jan. 13, 2006)