Lane v. State

Full title: JULIE NECOLE LANE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 17, 2015

168 So. 3d 1276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D13–4238.

2015-07-17

Julie Necole LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Kevin R. Monahan , Palatka, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Howard M. Maltz, Judge.
Kevin R. Monahan, Palatka, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Instructional error, if any, even if fundamental, was waived when Appellant requested the now challenged instruction. See Armstrong v. State, 579 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1991). Relief on this claim, if any, must await timely postconviction proceedings. SeeFla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.