Opinion
No. 05-03-01547-CR
Opinion Filed June 20, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the County Court At Law Grayson County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2000-1-906CR. Affirmed.
Before Justices O'NEILL, RICHTER, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Raymel Chamet Lane appeals her conviction, following a trial before the court, for prostitution. The trial court assessed punishment at forty-five days confinement and a $500 fine. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We attempted to advise appellant she has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, could not be located and, thus, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.