From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 1, 1971
183 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

46337, 46338.

SUBMITTED JUNE 28, 1971.

DECIDED JULY 1, 1971. REHEARING DENIED JULY 21, 1971.

Tax arbitration. Stewart Superior Court. Before Judge Marshall.

Jesse DuBose, for appellants.

Carlton S. Brown, for appellee.


Appellants received adverse judgments in the superior court on the issue of valuation of their respective real property for taxation. See Code § 92-6912, as amended.

1. In each case the appellant enumerates as error an identical instruction to the jury. The record does not reflect that either made any objection or exception before the jury returned its verdict as required by Code Ann. § 70-207 (a). Therefore, nothing is presented for consideration by these enumerations. John L. Hutcheson c. Hospital v. Oliver, 120 Ga. App. 547 (3) ( 171 S.E.2d 649).

2. In case No. 46338, the trial court refused to allow certain documentary evidence offered by the appellant. This evidence contained the valuation placed upon property of another situated near the appellant's property. The appellant's counsel admitted at the time of tender that no showing had been made that the property covered by the exhibit was in any way similar to appellant's land. Thus, the evidence was not relevant and was properly excluded. Code § 38-201.

Judgments affirmed. Pannell and Deen, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 28, 1971 — DECIDED JULY 1, 1971 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 21, 1971.


Summaries of

Lane v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 1, 1971
183 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Lane v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:LANE v. MORRISON et al. MILLER v. MORRISON et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 1, 1971

Citations

183 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
183 S.E.2d 533

Citing Cases

Southeastern c. Corp. v. Freeman

OCGA § 24-2-1. See Lane v. Morrison, 124 Ga. App. 316 (2) ( 183 S.E.2d 533) (1971). 5. Appellant takes issues…

Batson-Cook Co. v. Loden Co.

2. No objection having been made to the charge complained of in the 8th enumeration of error, it will not be…