From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Hoyt

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 1, 2018
249 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D18-2082

08-01-2018

Britany LANE f/k/a Brittany Hoyt, Petitioner, v. Charles HOYT, Respondent.

David A. Carroll, Pensacola, for Petitioner. Caryn Van Matre, Pensacola, for Respondent.


David A. Carroll, Pensacola, for Petitioner.

Caryn Van Matre, Pensacola, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Wetherell and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur; Bilbrey, J., concurs with opinion.

Bilbrey, J., concurring.The motion to disqualify the trial judge raised sufficient grounds for disqualification but was untimely. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(d)(1) & (e). I therefore concur in the denial of the petition for writ of prohibition. Of course, the trial judge retains "authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative." Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(i).


Summaries of

Lane v. Hoyt

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 1, 2018
249 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Lane v. Hoyt

Case Details

Full title:BRITANY LANE f/k/a Brittany Hoyt, Petitioner, v. CHARLES HOYT, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 1, 2018

Citations

249 So. 3d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)