Lane v. Hood River County

Full title: JOSHUA D. LANE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY, a public…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jun 11, 2009

08-CV-428-ST (D. Or. Jun. 11, 2009)

Opinion

08-CV-428-ST.

June 11, 2009

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#53) on March 20, 2009, in which she recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) and enter a Judgment in favor of Defendants. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9^th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8^th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#53). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.