From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Ehrlich

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 28, 2013
119 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2D13–1528.

2013-08-28

Robin R. LANE, Appellant, v. LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES W. EHRLICH; Charles W. Ehrlich, individually; Akerman Senterfitt & Edison, P.A.; and William Kalish, individually, Appellees.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; James M. Barton, Judge. Robin R. Lane, pro se. Hunter W. Carroll of Matthews Eastmoore, Sarasota, for Appellees, Charles W. Ehrlich and Law Offices of Charles W. Ehrlich.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; James M. Barton, Judge.
Robin R. Lane, pro se. Hunter W. Carroll of Matthews Eastmoore, Sarasota, for Appellees, Charles W. Ehrlich and Law Offices of Charles W. Ehrlich.
No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lane v. Ehrlich

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 28, 2013
119 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Lane v. Ehrlich

Case Details

Full title:Robin R. LANE, Appellant, v. LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES W. EHRLICH; Charles W…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

119 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)