From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 5, 2019
240 N.J. 187 (N.J. 2019)

Opinion

C-375 Sept. Term 2019 082743

12-05-2019

Cheri LANE, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum for the heirs-at-law of Albert Lane, III, deceased, and as General Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Lane, III, individually, and Derrick Lane, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, George Reese, Zsakheim James, Paul Price, Stephen Baker, Merari Pimentel, Fernando Badillo and Patric Cooper, Defendants-Respondents.


ORDER

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000556-17 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Lane v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 5, 2019
240 N.J. 187 (N.J. 2019)
Case details for

Lane v. City of Camden

Case Details

Full title:Cheri LANE, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum for the heirs-at-law of…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Dec 5, 2019

Citations

240 N.J. 187 (N.J. 2019)
221 A.3d 583