From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane Realty Company v. Fox

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 29, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 892 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

January 29, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, MEYER TOBIAS, J.

Esterman Reich ( Philip Esterman of counsel), for appellants.

Sparago Sparago ( William Sparago of counsel), for respondents.


In this action for brokerage commissions, it was error to exclude parol evidence to show that the binder agreement was conditional ( N.E.D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N.Y. 40).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Lane Realty Company v. Fox

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 29, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 892 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Lane Realty Company v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:LANE REALTY COMPANY, a Copartnership Composed of LOUIS W. LICHT, and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1960

Citations

23 Misc. 2d 892 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
206 N.Y.S.2d 308