From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jun 29, 2016
NO. 09-16-00127-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 09-16-00127-CRNO. 09-16-00128-CRNO. 09-16-00129-CR

06-29-2016

STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER LANDRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause Nos. 15-22972, 15-22973, 15-22974

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 9, 2016 the trial court sentenced Stephen Christopher Landry on three convictions for aggravated robbery. Landry filed a notice of appeal in each case on April 8, 2016. The district clerk has provided the trial court's certifications to the Court of Appeals. The trial court certified that these are plea-bargain cases and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On May 9, 2016, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeals unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeals. On May 18, 2016, we granted appellant's motion for extension of time to file a response in each case, but no response has been filed. Because the records do not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice Submitted on June 28, 2016
Opinion Delivered June 29, 2016
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Landry v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jun 29, 2016
NO. 09-16-00127-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Landry v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER LANDRY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

NO. 09-16-00127-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Landry

The Ninth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal because Applicant had no right of appeal. Landry v. State,…