From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. Nuvasive Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-00192 (W.D. La. Oct. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-00192

10-27-2016

Landry, et al v. NuVasive Inc., et al


Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' oral motion to amend is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that NuVasive Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiffs' Claims (3) and (4) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiffs' Claims (1) and (2), to the right of NuVasive to re-urge the Motion, if appropriate.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that not later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of the entry of this Judgment, Plaintiffs shall file their amended Complaint.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 27 day of October, 2016.

/s/_________

Rebecca F. Doherty

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Landry v. Nuvasive Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Oct 27, 2016
Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-00192 (W.D. La. Oct. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Landry v. Nuvasive Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Landry, et al v. NuVasive Inc., et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 27, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-00192 (W.D. La. Oct. 27, 2016)