From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. Aetna Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 16, 1983
442 So. 2d 440 (La. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-C-2303.

December 16, 1983.

In Re: Henry Landry, Sr. and Lonnie Landry, applying for writ of Certiorari or Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 12593; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, No. 78-648.


Granted. Reversed and remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider. The "law of the case" doctrine is a "discretionary guide" and has no application when an appellate court reviews a ruling of the district court or when there is palpable error in a prior ruling. See CCP 2164, comment (a), and Petition of Sewerage Water Board of New Orleans, La., 278 So.2d 81

MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., would deny and dissent from the order.


Our inadvertent denial of certiorari on the issue of Lonnie Landry's negligence in the consolidated case causes complications in the present case. However, the fact that the judgement in the consolidated case is now definitive does not preclude an independent determination of Lonnie Landry's demands in this case.


Summaries of

Landry v. Aetna Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 16, 1983
442 So. 2d 440 (La. 1983)
Case details for

Landry v. Aetna Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:HENRY LANDRY, SR. v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. LONNIE LANDRY v…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Dec 16, 1983

Citations

442 So. 2d 440 (La. 1983)

Citing Cases

Vincent v. Dodge

However, the doctrine is discretionary and is not applicable in cases of palpable error or when, if the law…

Turner v. Pelican

However, the "law of the case" doctrine is not mandatory, but is instead considered a "discretionary guide."…