From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landry v. A. O. Builders

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Oct 20, 1952
60 So. 2d 723 (La. Ct. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 19800.

October 20, 1952.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON, NO. 24638, DIVISION "A", L. ROBERT RIVARDE, JUDGE.

Harold J. Zeringer, Jr., New Orleans, and Lawrence L. Zeringer, New Orleans, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Willis C. McDonald and Patrick E. Carr, New Orleans, for defendants and appellees.


Plaintiffs' suit by which they seek to recover from defendants damages resulting from the alleged defective installation by defendants of a hardwood floor in the home of plaintiffs, under a written contract between the parties, was dismissed on an exception of prescription of one year filed by the defendants to the action, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Defendants-appellees made no appearance before us, nor did they file brief.

The trial court erred in maintaining the exception. The action brought by plaintiffs is one for damages ex contractu, and it is therefore not prescribed in one year. See Transportation Equipment Co. v. Younger Bros., La. App., 34 So.2d 347 and Bandel v. Sabine Lumber Co., 194 La. 31, 193 So. 359, and the authorities therein cited.

Therefore the judgment appealed from is reversed, and it is now ordered that the exception of prescription of one year filed by the defendants be and the same is hereby overruled, and the matter is remanded to the court below for further proceedings in accordance with law. Defendants-appellees are to bear the cost of this appeal and all other costs are to await a final determination of the matter.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Landry v. A. O. Builders

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Oct 20, 1952
60 So. 2d 723 (La. Ct. App. 1952)
Case details for

Landry v. A. O. Builders

Case Details

Full title:LANDRY et ux. v. A. O. BUILDERS et al

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans

Date published: Oct 20, 1952

Citations

60 So. 2d 723 (La. Ct. App. 1952)

Citing Cases

Hunter v. Mayfield

Therefore, this not being a redhibitory action, the prescription pleaded has no application. The prescription…

Brady Engine Company of Houma v. Devall

The testimony of the defendant, Devall, is that he purchased the engine and clutch assembly from defendant,…