From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landrey v. Chayret

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Mar 1, 1877
58 N.H. 89 (N.H. 1877)

Opinion

Decided March, 1877.

Payment in good faith, and without knowledge of the service of trustee process, will discharge the trustee, although legal service upon him had been made before such payment.

FOREIGN ATTACHMENT. On the trustees' pay-roll, indicating the names of persons working for them, appeared the name of a Frenchman, who, in October, 1875, answered to the name of Peter Shepard, and in November to that of Peter Stone, and as such received his wages for those two mouths, which are the funds which the plaintiff claims. There was nothing to indicate that the real name of Shepard or Stone was Pierre Chayret, or Peter Chayret, neither of which names was upon the pay-roll, and the trustees had no knowledge that any such person as Pierre Chayret, or Peter Chayret, ever existed. The court ordered the trustees discharged, and the plaintiff excepted.

G. Y. Sawyer Sawyer, Jr., for the plaintiff.

Stevens Parker, for the trustees.


Payment in good faith, and without knowledge of the service of trustee process, will discharge the trustee, although legal service upon him had been made previous to such payment. Williams v. Kenney, 98 Mass. 143; Williams v. Marston, 3 Pick. 65; Porter v. Stevens, 9 Cush. 530.

There was nothing in the facts disclosed to indicate that the payments to the man called Shepard, alias stone, were not made in good faith, and nothing to put the trustees upon inquiry concerning the identity of Pierre Chayret with Peter Shepard or Peter stone. In Hamlin v. Huse, and the Grand Trunk Railway, Trs., Coos, Jan., 1872, not reported, the agent of the corporation, after service upon them of a writ against Peter Huse, "made examination and inquiry, and could not hear that any person by that name had been in the employ of the road, and did not find that name on the company's books." Subsequently the agent paid wages, intended, in fact, for Peter Huse, to a laborer who signed his name on the pay-roll as P. Hughes. The court ordered that the trustees be discharged, being satisfied that the trustees had acted in good faith; and, upon exception taken, this judgment was affirmed.

Exception overruled.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Landrey v. Chayret

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Mar 1, 1877
58 N.H. 89 (N.H. 1877)
Case details for

Landrey v. Chayret

Case Details

Full title:LANDREY v. CHAYRET, and the NASHUA ROCHESTER RAILROAD, Trs

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Mar 1, 1877

Citations

58 N.H. 89 (N.H. 1877)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Beaupre

Upon these facts the trustee was entitled to a discharge. Landry v. Chayret, 58 N.H. 89, and cases cited. The…

Corning v. Records

That trustee process is an equitable proceeding in which the rights of the parties are determined upon…