From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landor v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1331 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1331

12-03-2012

DAMON LANDOR, Petitioner v. WARDEN B.A. BLEDSOE and DAVID BREWER, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 10), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 10) is adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.
4. A certificate of appealability is denied.

___________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Landor v. Bledsoe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1331 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Landor v. Bledsoe

Case Details

Full title:DAMON LANDOR, Petitioner v. WARDEN B.A. BLEDSOE and DAVID BREWER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1331 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Bacon v. Ortiz

However, that doctrine does not apply to prison disciplinary hearings. Landor v. Bledsoe, No. 1:12-CV-1331,…