Summary
observing that, if there is no ambiguity in the text, context, and extrinsic evidence relating to the conveyance, our analysis ends
Summary of this case from Thompson v. MarshallOpinion
A159429(S064571)
04-14-2017
Review Dismissed.
observing that, if there is no ambiguity in the text, context, and extrinsic evidence relating to the conveyance, our analysis ends
Summary of this case from Thompson v. MarshallA159429(S064571)
04-14-2017
Review Dismissed.
observing that, if there is no ambiguity in the text, context, and extrinsic evidence relating to the conveyance, our analysis ends
Summary of this case from Thompson v. Marshallresisting irrational construction
Summary of this case from State v. ChapmanFull title:LANDIS v. LIMBAUGH
Court:Supreme Court of Oregon.
Date published: Apr 14, 2017
As noted above, in determining if the trial court erred, we must view the evidence in the light most…
State v. ChapmanWe do not presume that the legislature intended irrational results. See Landis v. Limbaugh , 282 Or. App.…