From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landgren v. Hood River Sports Club, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 5, 2001
Civil No. 00-1502-AS (D. Or. Oct. 5, 2001)

Opinion

Civil No. 00-1502-AS.

October 5, 2001


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 11, 2001. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-5 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas' Findings and Recommendation #20. Defendant's motion (#8) for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Landgren v. Hood River Sports Club, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 5, 2001
Civil No. 00-1502-AS (D. Or. Oct. 5, 2001)
Case details for

Landgren v. Hood River Sports Club, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES LANDGREN, Plaintiff, v. HOOD RIVER SPORTS CLUB, INC., an Oregon…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 5, 2001

Citations

Civil No. 00-1502-AS (D. Or. Oct. 5, 2001)