From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landeverde v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 2008
971 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D07-4016.

January 16, 2008.

Appeal from the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Martin County, Larry Schack, J.

Marshall Landeverde, Crawfordville, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Marshall Landeverde seeks review of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Landeverde was convicted following a jury trial of first degree felony murder and two counts of burglary of a dwelling. His motion is based on "newly discovered evidence" in the form of a codefendant's "statement." Because the statement is not inherently incredible as a matter of law and would have been material to Landeverde's "independent act" defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether it in fact constitutes newly discovered evidence. Barrow v. State, 940 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Brantley v. State, 912 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Landeverde v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 2008
971 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Landeverde v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marshall LANDEVERDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 2008

Citations

971 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)