From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lander v. Nacri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 18, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The record reveals that the plaintiff failed to present any evidence that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of any dangerous condition on his roof which could have caused the plaintiff to slip and fall, or that the defendant or his employees had created any dangerous condition. Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and the defendant was properly granted judgment as a matter of law (see, e.g., Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Bogart v. Woolworth Co., 24 N.Y.2d 936; Katcher v. Ideal Tennis, 65 A.D.2d 751; Dowling v. Woolworth Co., 16 A.D.2d 672). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lander v. Nacri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Lander v. Nacri

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTUS F. LANDER, Appellant, v. JOANNE NACRI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Tobar v. City of New York

ave the duty to maintain its roadways in a reasonably safe condition (see, Friedman v State of New York, 67…

Ferlito v. Great South Bay Associates

, 67 N.Y.2d 836). Photographs may be used to prove constructive notice of an alleged defect shown in the…