Opinion
CASE NO. 1:07-CV-00815-AWI-DLB PC DOC. 96 DOC. 106
01-06-2012
SID LANDAU, Plaintiff, v. W. T. VOSS, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ALLEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff Sid Landau ("Plaintiff") is a California civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 14, 2011, Defendant Wendy Allen filed a motion for summary judgment. Doc. 96. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty-one days. Doc. 106. No party filed a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed November 9, 2011, is adopted in full;
2. Defendant Wendy Allen's motion for summary judgment, filed April 14, 2011, is granted;
3. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant Allen and against Plaintiff; and
4. Defendant Allen is dismissed from this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE