From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landau v. Forrest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2012
1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2012)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC

04-27-2012

SID LANDAU, Plaintiff, v. JAMES FORREST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER VACATING MAY 7, 2012

TELEPHONIC HEARING


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (DOC. 110)


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

Plaintiff Sid Landau ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 13, 2012, the Court issued a Second Scheduling Order, and ordered Plaintiff to file a pretrial statement by April 13, 2012. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute; and
2. The May 7, 2012 telephonic hearing is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Landau v. Forrest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2012
1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Landau v. Forrest

Case Details

Full title:SID LANDAU, Plaintiff, v. JAMES FORREST, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 27, 2012

Citations

1:07-cv-00815-AWI-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2012)