Lancaster v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Thompson v. State

    349 Ga. App. 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)

    (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Lancaster v. State , 291 Ga. App. 347, 348, 662 S.E.2d 181 (2008). "Further, to sustain a judgment of conviction based upon circumstantial evidence, the evidence need not exclude every inference or hypothesis except the guilt of the accused, but only reasonable inferences and hypotheses, so as to justify the inference, beyond a reasonable doubt, of guilt."

  2. Allen v. State

    814 S.E.2d 740 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that a plea in bar claiming double jeopardy would not have been successful and, therefore, trial counsel's failure to pursue it does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel

    (Citations omitted.) Lancaster v. State , 291 Ga. App. 347, 348, 662 S.E.2d 181 (2008). "We do not ... re-weigh testimony, determine witness credibility, or address assertions of conflicting evidence; our role is to determine whether the evidence presented is sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."