From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 20, 1998
137 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-6735.

DECIDED March 20, 1998

Stephen A. Strickland, Richard S. Jaffe, Cecilee R. Beasley, Richard S. Jaffe, P.C., Dan L. Turberville, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Darly L. Masters, Kelly Gallops Davidson, Bart Harmon, Webb Eley, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (No. 95-0351-CB-C), Charles R. Butler, Jr., Judge.

Before BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and PROPST, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.


Consistent with our prior opinion in this case, see Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama, 116 F.3d 1419, 1428-29 n. 11 (11th Cir. 1997), after our issuance of that opinion, the parties moved for a stay of the mandate pending the results of mediation. We stayed the mandate, and have now been informed that the parties have worked out a settlement of the entire case, which they wish to effectuate in the district court.

Accordingly, we remand the entire case to the district court for that purpose. Our mandate will issue forthwith and the parties may file the necessary papers in the district court to effectuate their settlement.


Summaries of

Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Mar 20, 1998
137 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama

Case Details

Full title:Cylinda H. LANCASTER, as the administratrix of the estate of Harold B…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Mar 20, 1998

Citations

137 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

IN RE AOL TIME WARNER ERISA LITIGATION

A. The Payment Plan is Fair, Reasonable, and Adequate A federal court of appeals may vest the district court…