From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanasa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 7, 1993
860 S.W.2d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 63419.

September 7, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ALPHONSO VOORHEES, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Lanasa v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 7, 1993
860 S.W.2d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Lanasa v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LANASA, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 7, 1993

Citations

860 S.W.2d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)