From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lampton v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B
Mar 25, 1935
160 So. 274 (Miss. 1935)

Opinion

No. 31660.

March 25, 1935.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR.

Appeal would not be reinstated after dismissal, where appellant paid no attention to motion to dismiss.

2. APPEAL AND ERROR.

Appeal would not be reinstated, where motion to reinstate was made after term at which appeal was dismissed and no special circumstances were shown excusing delay (Code 1930, sections 3358, 3382).

APPEAL from the circuit court of Walthall county.

HON.E.J. SIMMONS, Judge.

Suit between B.F. Lampton and another and F.L. Stevens. From a judgment, party first named appealed, and the appeal was dismissed. On motion to reinstate the appeal. Motion overruled.

Rawls Hathorn, of Columbia, for appellant.

T.B. Davis, of Columbia, for appellee.

Briefs of counsel not found.


The motion for a new trial was overruled on August 13, 1934. Notice was given the court reporter August 21, 1934, to transcribe his notes. Appeal bond was filed on October 23, 1934. The return day for the appeal was the first Monday in January, 1935. The record not having been filed, appellee moved, on January 16, 1935, to docket and dismiss. No response to this motion was made by appellant, although appellant admits that the motion was served on its attorney on the date last mentioned. The motion was sustained, and the appeal was dismissed on January 28, 1935. The motion to reinstate the appeal was filed on March 4, 1935.

The motion to reinstate must be overruled for two reasons: First, because no attention was paid by appellant to the motion to dismiss; and, second, because the statute by its express language limits the right of reinstatement to the term within which the order of dismissal was made. The language is that "the cause may be re-instated at any time during the term." Section 3382, Code 1930. The September, 1934, term of this court expired at twelve P.M., March 3, 1935. Section 3358, Code 1930. Stovall v. Graves-Ramsey Motor Co., 167 Miss. 201, 149 So. 733. No such special circumstances are shown as would take the motion out of the operation of the limitations of the statute, if any special circumstances could so operate, as to which we do not decide.

Motion overruled.


Summaries of

Lampton v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B
Mar 25, 1935
160 So. 274 (Miss. 1935)
Case details for

Lampton v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:LAMPTON et al. v. STEVENS

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B

Date published: Mar 25, 1935

Citations

160 So. 274 (Miss. 1935)
160 So. 274