From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lampkin v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 23, 1918
80 So. 398 (Ala. 1918)

Opinion

8 Div. 111.

November 28, 1918. Rehearing Denied December 23, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; Robert C. Brickell, Judge.

E. W. Godbey, of Decatur, for appellant.

Wert Lynne, of Decatur, for appellee.


Eliminating the question of the credibility of the witnesses, we are of the opinion that the evidence in this case did not justify the allowance of the item of $3 for oats and $2.50 for corn, as part of the account against defendant.

Let the judgment be corrected by deducting these items, and, as corrected, affirmed at the cost of appellee.

Corrected and affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lampkin v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 23, 1918
80 So. 398 (Ala. 1918)
Case details for

Lampkin v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:LAMPKIN v. THOMAS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Dec 23, 1918

Citations

80 So. 398 (Ala. 1918)
80 So. 398

Citing Cases

Dunn v. Ponceler

Edwards v. Richards, 95 Ga. 655, 22 S.E. 690; Beason v. Coleman, 92 Miss. 622, 46 So. 49; Silberberg v.…

Ashurst v. Rosser

The judgment, as so corrected, is affirmed at the cost of appellees. See Cassels v. Alabama City, G. A. R.…