Under these circumstances, in which the parties essentially agree that Morton's voluntary consumption of alcohol was the cause of his death, we conclude that a reasonable jury could not differ about whether plaintiff's recovery was barred by MCL 600.2955a and therefore that defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Piccalo (On Remand), 252 Mich App at 680; see also Lamphiere v Abraham, 493 Mich 1021; 829 NW2d 879 (2013), (YOUNG, C.J. (concurring)) (concurring in the denial of leave to appeal when this Court "correctly affirmed the circuit court's [grant of summary disposition] under MCL 600.2955a(1) that plaintiff's inebriation 'was 50% or more the cause of' " the plaintiff's fall from a balcony, although the case proceeded regarding a possible separate and distinct injury caused by a delay in seeking medical treatment). We conclude that Morton's death, while tragic, wholly or predominantly resulted from his own conduct, and that Morton alone bears personal responsibility for that.