From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamon v. Mey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2021
2:20-cv-01474-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01474-TLN-KJN

11-01-2021

BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, v. S. MEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 48.) On August 19, 2021, Plaintiff was granted a forty-five days extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 56.) Forty-five days passed and plaintiff did not file objections. On October 5, 2021, Defendants filed a notice of supplemental authority. (ECF No. 57.)

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 30, 2021, (ECF No. 48), are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to revoke plaintiffs in forma pauperis status, (ECF No. 38), is GRANTED; Plaintiff is ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days of the date of this order. Dated: November 01, 2021


Summaries of

Lamon v. Mey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2021
2:20-cv-01474-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Lamon v. Mey

Case Details

Full title:BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, v. S. MEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01474-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2021)