From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Plaintiff v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SKO PC.

December 8, 2010


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME


Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 3, 2010, Defendants submitted an application for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #60.)

Plaintiff has not yet filed his opposition, but Defendants argue that the opposition is due on December 30, 2010 and Defendants' counsel will be on vacation during that time. Defendants seek to extend the deadline for filing a reply to January 7, 2010.

Good cause having been shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' reply shall be served and filed by January 7, 2010, or within seven days after Plaintiff's opposition is served, whichever date comes later.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 7, 2010


Summaries of

Plaintiff v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Plaintiff v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)