From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamon v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SMS (PC)

11-26-2012

BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY


(Doc. 192)

On September 7, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 175.) After requesting and receiving an extension, Plaintiff filed an opposition on October 29, 2012 and Defendants filed a reply on March 5, 2008. (Docs. 176, 177, 183-186.) On November 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a surreply which he titled as an "Optional Response to Defendants' Reply." (Doc. 192.)

Plaintiff does not have a right to file a surreply under the Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Plaintiff did not obtain leave of court to do so. Therefore, Plaintiff's surreply is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lamon v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Lamon v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:BARRY LOUIS LAMON, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00205-LJO-SMS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)