From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lammers v. Lammers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1996
227 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 21, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


The award of attorneys' fees was proper because it primarily compensated plaintiff for delays in the trial caused by defendant, the penalizing component, if any, being secondary ( Davis v. Davis, 128 A.D.2d 470, 479-480; cf., Eldridge v Eldridge, 141 A.D.2d 371). The evidence adduced at trial was clearly sufficient to establish constructive abandonment and cruel and inhuman treatment, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The court did not improperly proceed with the trial in defendant's absence, the record showing that defendant, who appeared pro se, had notice that the trial would proceed but chose not to attend. We have considered defendant's remaining arguments, including that the Trial Justice was biased, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Lammers v. Lammers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1996
227 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Lammers v. Lammers

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. LAMMERS, Respondent, v. ELIZABETH F. LAMMERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 255 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Lammers v. Lammers

Given the numerous frivolous motions defendant has made, it was a proper exercise of discretion for the court…

Lammers v. Lammers

Decided November 19, 1996 Appeal from (1st Dept: 227 A.D.2d 255) FINALITY OF JUDGMENTS AND…