From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambright v. Brogan

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 9, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-0274 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-0274.

August 9, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has objected to a Report and Recommendation that this case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The objections do not address the fact that plaintiff and defendants are all citizens of Ohio, which is why this federal court has no jurisdiction to hear her claims. The objections are OVERRULED, and the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the complaint, the Report and Recommendation, and this order to the defendants.


Summaries of

Lambright v. Brogan

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 9, 2007
Case No. 2:07-cv-0274 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Lambright v. Brogan

Case Details

Full title:Marlene Lambright, Plaintiff, v. Michael D. Brogan, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-0274 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Powell v. Bartlett Med. Clinic & Wellness Ctr.

Certainly, medical malpractice is a tort claim arising under Ohio, not federal law. Lambright v. Brogan, No.…

Gray v. Nabavi

(citing Lambright v. Brogan, No. 2:07-cv-274, 2007 WL 2326879, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 10, 2007)).…