From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. Wolfe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 96-247 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 96-247 Erie.

June 25, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 20, 1996, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 71], filed on May 31, 2007, recommended that the motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 55] be denied in all respects. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. The Commonwealth Defendants filed objections [Doc. No. 72] on June 8, 2007, and Plaintiff filed a Response to the objections [Doc. No. 73] on June 15, 2007. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the objections thereto and the response to the objections, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 55] is DENIED in all respects.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 71] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 31, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Lambert v. Wolfe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2007
Civil Action No. 96-247 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Lambert v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:LISA LAMBERT, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM WOLFE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 25, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 96-247 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jun. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Allegheny Cnty.

The right of an incarcerated person not to be sexually assaulted by prison personnel is clearly established.…

Climo v. Rustin

Further, although Climo argues that she has asserted an "independent basis" for her Fourteenth Amendment…