From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 27, 1994
635 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-2856.

April 27, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Kathleen A. Kearney, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's convictions and sentences, but we reverse a condition of probation that appellant have no contact with children under age 10. This was the only condition of probation appellant raised as error. We reverse this condition because it is too broad. The condition of probation must be more specific so that appellant cannot be charged with an unintentional violation of it. Lambert v. State, 635 So.2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); see Dean v. State, 629 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lambert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 27, 1994
635 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Lambert v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE LAMBERT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 27, 1994

Citations

635 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Oliver v. State

We strike that language in special condition 15 which explicitly prohibits appellant's contact with minor…

Graham v. State

The State agrees that the condition barring any contact with the children is too broad because the…