From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hosp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 20, 2012
100 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-20

Michael LAMBE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants, Smith Carroad Levy P.C., Defendant–Respondent.

Silver & Silver, LLP, New York (Herbert J. Silver of counsel), for appellant. Smith, Carroad, Levy & Wan, Commack (Timothy Wan of counsel), for respondent.


Silver & Silver, LLP, New York (Herbert J. Silver of counsel), for appellant. Smith, Carroad, Levy & Wan, Commack (Timothy Wan of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered July 27, 2011, which granted defendant-respondent's (defendant) motion to dismiss the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable cause of action as against defendant. Indeed, read generously, the complaint merely alleges that defendant issued restraining notices on a duly filed default judgment, obtained by predecessor counsel. This conduct does not amount to a tort (*856Caribbean Constr. Servs. & Assoc. v. Zurich Ins. Co., 267 A.D.2d 81, 83, 700 N.Y.S.2d 129 [1st Dept. 1999] ).

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, ACOSTA, FREEDMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hosp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 20, 2012
100 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Lambe v. Lenox Hill Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:Michael LAMBE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7865
953 N.Y.S.2d 855

Citing Cases

Landmark Ventures, Inc. v. Insightec, Ltd.

The plaintiff is required to establish culpable conduct on the part of the defendant, mere persuasion is…