From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LAMBDEN'S EX'R v. NORRIS

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1832
1 Del. 22 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)

Opinion

Spring Sessions, 1832.

Bates for plff. Huffington for deft.


The plff. not being able to prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness, offered to prove the handwriting of the obligor; which the defendant objected to.


This evidence is not competent. You must first prove the handwriting of the subscribing witness if he be dead, or insane, or infamous. It is not sufficient to prove the handwriting of the obligor. This is permitted only where the witness does not recollect being present at the time,. or did not attest the execution of the instrument.

The plff. was nonsuited.


Summaries of

LAMBDEN'S EX'R v. NORRIS

Superior Court of Delaware
Jan 1, 1832
1 Del. 22 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)
Case details for

LAMBDEN'S EX'R v. NORRIS

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW B. BOYER, Ex'r. of THOS. LAMBDEN, deceased vs. RICHARD NORRIS

Court:Superior Court of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1832

Citations

1 Del. 22 (Del. Super. Ct. 1832)