From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. S.C. DMV Office

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 17, 2018
No. 18-1593 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1593

09-17-2018

RICHARD B. LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees.

Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN) Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard B. Lamb appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. SC Dep't of Motor Vehicles, No. 0:18-cv-00552-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Lamb v. S.C. DMV Office

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 17, 2018
No. 18-1593 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Lamb v. S.C. DMV Office

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD B. LAMB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 17, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1593 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2018)