From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. Moore

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 14, 2011
Civ. No. 10-511-CL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-511-CL.

March 14, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

It has been more than sixty days since mail sent by the court to petitioner was returned as undeliverable. Petitioner has not notified the court of a change in his mailing address. Under these circumstances, Local Rule 83.12 authorizes this court to dismiss an action. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#23) is adopted. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 14 day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Lamb v. Moore

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 14, 2011
Civ. No. 10-511-CL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Lamb v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL HOWARD LAMB, Petitioner, v. MRS. LISA MOORE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 14, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 10-511-CL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2011)