From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Feb 5, 2008
CASE NO. 5:07cv132-RS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:07cv132-RS.

February 5, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Secretary has moved for entry of judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remand of this cause to the Commissioner. Plaintiff's counsel does not object to the motion. Doc. 22. A sentence four remand is discretionary, but requires that the court enter "a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner." The proper option in this case is to reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand. Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 111 S.Ct. 2157 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993).

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that:

1. The court GRANT Defendant's motion for remand, doc. 22.

2. The court DIRECT the Clerk to enter final judgment REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits and REMANDING the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) consistent with this report and recommendation.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and


Summaries of

Lamb v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Feb 5, 2008
CASE NO. 5:07cv132-RS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Lamb v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LEYMAN L. LAMB, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 5:07cv132-RS (N.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2008)