From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 19, 1938
112 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 19318.

Delivered January 19, 1938.

Burglary — Affirmance.

Where the testimony for the State showed that defendant and another committed the offense, no bills of exception were brought forward, and no exceptions were leveled at the charge of the court, conviction for burglary was affirmed.

Appeal from District Court of Howard County. Hon. Chas. L. Klapproth, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for burglary; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Martin Shipman, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

On the night of February 11, 1937, the place of business of H. E. Dickerson was burglarized and a cash register and other property taken therefrom. The cash register was later recovered. The testimony on the part of the State was sufficient to show that appellant and Elton L. Keele committed the burglary. Appellant introduced witnesses whose testimony raised the issue of alibi. Testifying in his own behalf, appellant denied that he participated in the burglary.

No bills of exception are brought forward and no exceptions were leveled at the charge of the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Lamar v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 19, 1938
112 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
Case details for

Lamar v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS LAMAR v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 19, 1938

Citations

112 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1938)
112 S.W.2d 724