From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamar v. Rabasco

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2012-06923 2012-05663 2012-05664 2012-05665 Docket No. F-03166/94/11 M141587

08-03-2012

In the Matter of Stacy Lamar, respondent, v. Ronald Rabasco, appellant.


, A.P.J.

REINALDO E. RIVERA

PETER B. SKELOS

MARK C. DILLON

DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeals by Ronald Rabasco from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated May 24, 2012. Pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it is

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion this appeals is consolidated with the appeals pending under Appellate Division Docket Nos. 2012-05663, 2012-05664, and 2012-05665; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeals in the above-entitled proceeding shall be perfected within 60 days after the receipt by the appellant of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the appellant shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, in cases where there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this scheduling order; and it is further,

ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeals to show cause why the appeals should or should not be dismissed.

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, SKELOS, DILLON and ANGIOLILLO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

The Case Manager assigned to this case is Ms. Vazquez. Please contact her at 718-722-6488 with any questions.


Summaries of

Lamar v. Rabasco

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Aug 3, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Lamar v. Rabasco

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Stacy Lamar, respondent, v. Ronald Rabasco, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 3, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 80570 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)